Re: OT - Votes for Bush
- From: "Terry" <tball161@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 06:57:30 -0400
"zatoichi" <zatoichi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:en4fa2t4fqqr768ia3kqnud6fj3957lk2h@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 05:28:02 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote:he's not trying to anger you.
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 20:58:44 +0200, zatoichi <zatoichi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 06:41:46 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:32:28 -0500, " Kurt Lochner (Weasels Remember!)"
<kurt_lochner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--Say, didn't you lie about your "physics problems" you couldn't work?
You have a 1 meter diameter spherical surface of
Unobtanium 597. It has no mass.
This material is 100% reflective in the entire electromagnetic
spectrum, has zero thermal conductivity, infinite strength and
reflects all known particles as well.
Inside this sphere is a 10 kilogram fissionable mass,
triggered to explode in a nuclear fireball at a huge efficiency
*at a random time*.
When it goes off half it's mass will, in the end,
become photons of various sorts and the particles that
remain will all be neutrons (and thus not interact with
the photons). The photons just keep bouncing off
the inside of the sphere ......
How much does the sphere and it's contents mass? When?
Remember Schrodinger's cat ...
Now, about all those photons (energy, right?) .....
Assuming that with "100% reflective in the entire electromagnetic
spectrum, has zero thermal conductivity, infinite strength and
reflects all known particles as well" you meant - true isolated
system...
Expect from idiots something like "this is not possible in the real
world" and "it is impossible to...".
"huge efficiency", "at a random time" , "Schrodinger's cat", and
pretty much anything that happens inside such sphere are here to
confuse the unwary.
LOL ...
Assuming the reader is familiar with the conservation of the
four-momentum...
Better make that conservation of energy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rest mass of the sphere is observed at any
given time
rest mass = constant = 10 kg
-------------------------------------------
Of course if our sphere is not so perfectly isolated then:
E=energy exchanged with the external environment
(positive sign for energy out of sphere)
rest mass = 10 kg - E/c^2
And we sort of know that at some point in time (the cat willing)
half of the original 10 kg became that E ...
I didn't say that Cliff. You got it wrong I am afraid.
E=energy exchanged with the external environment
It could be a PART of that original 10 kg mass turned into an energy
minus any intake of energy to the sphere from external environment.
---------------------------------
Easy peasy Japanesey
So what's the mass of that sphere & it's contents <G>?
10 kg
10 kg
10 kg
10 kg :-)
When?
For Christ's sake Cliff, read again what I wrote.
From now till eternity.
Why?LOL
Because I say SO.
Don't make me angry.
he's trying to convince you of his intelligence.
surely he has.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Votes for Bush
- From: Cliff
- Re: OT - Votes for Bush
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Bitch Slapped
- Next by Date: Re: The dangers of wearing shorts in a machine shop
- Previous by thread: Re: Republican Rush Limp***
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Votes for Bush
- Index(es):