Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: "jon_banquer" <jon_banquer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Jan 2006 22:39:15 -0800
John R. Carroll wrote:
> jon_banquer wrote:
> > John R. Carroll wrote:
> >> John Scheldroup wrote:
> >>> "John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>> news:zu0uf.8225$oW.6939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> jon_banquer wrote:
> >>>>> BottleBob wrote:
> >>>>>> "John R. Carroll" wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> > Ahhh... but your preaching to the choir once again, John. GaryR and
> > Cliffy will be along shortly to help you as well. I doubt Michael
> > Gailey will be backing you up though. You were never really honest
> > about that deal and Visual Mill were you ?
>
>
>
> That deal and Visual Mill? You aren't even making sense Jon.
> Anyone indicating that there is or was any "deal" as you put it between
> Michael and I regarding VM or anything else is not being truthful Jon. It's
> that simple and that doesn't need backing up as it's the plain truth. I
> honestly doubt that Michael has said otherwise but wouldn't give a hoot in
> hell if he had. Especially if he'd said it to you.
>
> >
> > Why not try getting Bob to agree with your statements.
>
>
> Why would I try to get anyone to back up or agree with anything? I'm not
> preaching to anyone Jon. Your statements are clearly in your last few posts.
> They are your own words. No outside agreement is required, or desired for
> that matter.
> You falsely stated that I was representing specific product lines and
> otherwise doing things that I am not doing. You clearly stated that what I
> had posted was a reflection of my representation of those products. That was
> and is a flat out lie. Period. It is also exactly the sort of ignorant thing
> you repeatedly do. You have no interest at all in the truth and you don't
> take any responsbility for your mistakes. Your only interest is in puffing
> your own tremendous over inflated ego at the expense of somebody else. Find
> another target.
> You either knew you were wrong and lied or you shot your mouth off without
> knowing the truth. You would rather sit here and drag through the mud than
> admit you were wrong and apologize. It really is that plain Jon. You are
> apparently either so blind you can't see that or so full of yourself that
> you won't admit your mistake.
>
>
> >
> > Why not try getting Bob to say that what Scheldroup tried to pull with
> > his Connie post was acceptable and that I'm not owed an apology.
>
> Again Jon,
> None of this has anything to do with your own false statements about my
> business. If you want Bob to say something take it up with Bob.
> You can also take your JS problems up with him Connie or whoever and not me.
> Same with Closs. I haven't spoken with Bruce recently but I just reconciled
> my bank statement and his last commission check was one of the cancelled
> checks. I'll see if he wants you to have his home number if you like and you
> two can have yourselves a nice chat. He's been very helpful and I'm glad of
> it.
>
> I think you're the one that needs to "get over it" Jon, not me. I'm so far
> over it I have forgotten what "it" was.
> Life goes on and as amusing as our exchanges can sometimes be mine is going
> to get on along without you.
>
> Jerk...
>
>
> --
> John R. Carroll
> Machining Solution Software, Inc.
> Los Angeles San Francisco
> www.machiningsolution.com
"Why would I try to get anyone to back up or agree with anything?"
Good question. I don't believe Bob will back you up. I don't think you
do either. Which is why you won't ask Bob.
"You falsely stated that I was representing specific product lines"
What one would that be ? Specific FACTS are once again a problem for
you, John. What else is new !
I said you represented TopSolid... you do.
I said you at one time represented Vero VisiCADCAM... you did and even
though it's not on your website you say you do now.
I said you sold MetaCut Utilities... you do.
"you clearly stated that what I had posted was a reflection of my
representation of those products. That was and is a flat out lie."
More broad sweeping generalities, John. Stop beating around the bush
and get specific. Your such a wimp.
"Why would I try to get anyone to back up or agree with anything? I'm
not
preaching to anyone Jon."
Sure you are. Your preaching to Scheldroup who is such a slime bag he
feels it's appropriate to bring Connie up in a thread that is not
relevant cause he doesn't like what I have to say about SaladWorks. Now
that she is in prison or jail or whatever for credit card fraud
Scheldroup is such a slime ball he can't admit he was beyond wrong.
"I think you're the one that needs to "get over it" Jon, not me. I'm so
far over it I have forgotten what "it" was."
Your posts consistently show how angry you are with me. Deal with the
reality of the crap you spew in your posts.
Way to go on avoiding all the specifics questions I asked you. Your so
transparent, John.
jon
"I may have many faults, but being wrong ain't one of them." ... Jimmy
Hoffa
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: CunningLinguist
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: jon_banquer
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: John R. Carroll
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: jon_banquer
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: John R. Carroll
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: jon_banquer
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: John R. Carroll
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: John Scheldroup
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: John R. Carroll
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: jon_banquer
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- From: John R. Carroll
- Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fadal 104/D, more Fun
- Next by Date: Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- Next by thread: Re: Hey Babe, dats a nice pair you got there--vise jaws, that is... [Re: G-Code Libraries ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading