Re: Liquidmetal
- From: D Murphy <spamto154@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Nov 2005 02:54:53 GMT
Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:9ierm1t4kpeb70lv4ar8u54ahkv6gv2id1@xxxxxxx:
> On 6 Nov 2005 06:16:58 GMT, D Murphy <spamto154@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
>>
>>I remember seeing the bouncing ball demo some time ago. I wonder how
>>this stuff cuts.
>
> Might cut quite well. Why not ask them?
>
>>While they tout it as being like plastic, the reality is that
>>it would be more like glass.
>
> Amorphous materials both.
>
>>It has a high hardness and is no doubt very
>>brittle.
>
> That does not follow at all.
> "Metallic glasses" are famed for their formability.
At what temperature?
>
>>I seriously doubt they could hold all of the tolerances required
>>on a hip stem without doing some machining.
>
> Precision investment casting can hold very tight tolerances,
> as can various sintering methods.
The hip stem has a tight tolerance taper that locks into the ball.
>
>>I also wonder if they are just trading the expense of machining for a
>>more expensive alloy.
>
> Machining is expensive and may have scrap.
You think?
--
Dan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Liquidmetal
- From: Cliff
- Re: Liquidmetal
- References:
- Liquidmetal
- From: D Murphy
- Re: Liquidmetal
- From: clay
- Re: Liquidmetal
- From: D Murphy
- Re: Liquidmetal
- From: Cliff
- Liquidmetal
- Prev by Date: Re: Liquidmetal
- Next by Date: Re: Liquidmetal
- Previous by thread: Re: Liquidmetal
- Next by thread: Re: Liquidmetal
- Index(es):