Re: Machining Choices
- From: Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:31:48 -0500
On 31 Oct 2005 05:17:03 GMT, D Murphy <spamto154@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:otmam1htbhp9tica0jjuvhv528cgmgrt58@
>4ax.com:
>
>> Problem is that the floating ring is about 3/4 as wide (or a bit
>> more) as the "groove" it was machined out of ... just as a starter.
>
>I wonder if they started with a bigger diameter and swaged or rolled it
>down before parting the ring.
I sort of doubt it.
IIRC The part was Aluminum, about 2 inches OD, 6 inches
long with the sliding ring being about 2.5 inches wide seeming to
clear on it's ID by perhaps .1" and riding in that "slot" no wider
than about 3 inches.
I've been puzzled for decades <G>. I do hope that there was
no cheating involved .... THAT would be so simple.
--
Cliff
.
- References:
- Machining Choices
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Machining Choices
- From: Steve Walker
- Re: Machining Choices
- From: D Murphy
- Re: Machining Choices
- From: Cliff
- Re: Machining Choices
- From: D Murphy
- Re: Machining Choices
- From: D Murphy
- Machining Choices
- Prev by Date: Re: Precision center
- Next by Date: Re: used Mazaks
- Previous by thread: Re: Machining Choices
- Next by thread: Re: Machining Choices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|