Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- From: BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 00:27:08 GMT
Cliff wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 21:21:18 GMT, BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >Cliff wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 03:05:49 GMT, BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Cliff wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >> John,
> >> >> Free electrons have little to do with the conduction of
> >> >> heat.
> >> >
> >> >Cliff:
> >> >
> >> > Free electrons are supposedly one of the main reasons why metals
> >> >conduct heat so well compared to other substances.
> >> >
> >> >> Don't confuse it with electricity or electrical conduction.
> >> >
> >> > Actually, I believe that the metals that are the best electrical
> >> >conductors tend to also be the best conductors of heat.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Gee .... then explain why Diamond conducts better ......
> >
> >Cliff:
> >
> > Since when is Diamond (carbon), considered a metal? You DID notice the
> >word "Metal" in my two statements above, didn't you?
>
> "Best conductors of heat"? "Best electrical conductors"?
Cliff:
That's not what I said, is it. What *I* said is right in the post
you're responding to. But to refresh your memory here it is again:
"Free electrons are supposedly one of the main reasons why *METALS*
conduct heat so well compared to other substances." "Metals" emphasized
so you'll have no trouble missing it again.
>
> >> And raising the temperature increases the thermal conductivity while
> >> decreasing the electrical conductivity .....
> >>
> >> So electrically conductive saltwater should be an even better by
> >> far thermal conductor than deionized water?
> >
> > Saltwater is obviously not a METAL, now is it.
>
> Why not, all those "free electrons" to conduct all that
> heat .... <G>?
You're asking why saltwater isn't a metal?? Please define METAL.
>
> >> Electrons play a role in some cases but that's not all that there
> >> is to it.
> >> Like I kept telling John, look at the mass of the electron compared
> >> to atoms then consider Newton's momentum & energy ...
> >
> >===========================================================
> >http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
> >
> > Non-metallic solids transfer heat by lattice vibrations so that there
> >is no net motion of the media as the energy propagates through. Such
> >heat transfer is often described in terms of "phonons", quanta of
> >lattice vibrations. Metals are much better thermal conductors than
> >non-metals because the same mobile electrons which participate in
> >electrical conduction also take part in the transfer of heat.
> >===========================================================
>
> You saw the numbers I posted for Diamond & Silver & forgot already?
I didn't forget. I just pointed out that the free electrons in metals
are conducive to conduction, thermal as well as electrical. Contrary to
your criticism of John's comments.
>
> >===========================================================
> >http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/py105/Heattransfer.html
> >
> >Conduction
> >
> >When heat is transferred via conduction, the substance itself does not
> >flow; rather, heat is transferred internally, by vibrations of atoms and
> >molecules. Electrons can also carry heat, which is the reason metals are
> >generally very good conductors of heat. Metals have many free electrons,
> >which move around randomly; these can transfer heat from one part of the
> >metal to another.
> >===========================================================
> >
> > What's the matter with you lately Cliff, you just seem to be making
> >these WAG's seemingly based only upon pure conjecture and speculation.
>
> Nope.
> But some have a few comprehension issues.
I fail to understand what emotional need is satisfied by your constant
obfuscation and misdirection.
--
BottleBob
http://home.earthlink.net/~bottlbob
.
- References:
- Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- From: BottleBob
- Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- From: Cliff
- Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- Next by Date: Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|