Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited


"Cliff" <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:31hrj1p5sibjv4s8a72ifjhgs08n0bjn8b@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:58:10 -0500, "John Scheldroup"
> <jschel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Cliff" <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:rb7qj1hvs6qfnd8lha5q3i33542jug3juh@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:21:24 -0500, "John Scheldroup"
>>> <jschel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Cliff" <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:h5ioj15jpi8k54u6496jro36iujlhhmqtl@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:24:27 -0500, "John Scheldroup"
>>>>> <jschel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> And many may be misusing the term "conduction". It's a bit
>>>>>>> like billet, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Conduction is kinetic, when free electrons are conducted from the
>>>>>>stored unit of potential of "heat" in the water.
>>>>>
>>>>> John,
>>>>> Free electrons have little to do with the conduction of
>>>>> heat. Don't confuse it with electricity or electrical conduction.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Electromagnetic radiation is made when an atom absorbs energy.
>>>
>>> No, John.
>>> In some cases that would be "absorbs electromagnetic energy"
>>> (a photon).
>>
>>No, No Cliff.
>
> John, you said "Electromagnetic radiation" which only impacts
> electrons and protons, usually.

Actually Cliff you said lasing not me, (hence your "a photon")
Lasing has little to do with lattice vibrations within this "solid"


> The electron cloud about the nucleus of atoms (not to mention
> possible nuclear forces) "shield" the protons in the nucleus
> from EM radiation, usually.
> That leaves only the bound electrons to be impacted.
>

Which bound electrons do you speak of, those free electrons conducting
heat, or those electrons bound to their atoms within a lattice? The entire
atom shakes loose as it were electrons when they vibrate, hence these bound
electrons you speak of are struck free to exchange energy with higher energy
electrons. I can expand upon that later.

A little busy now I'll try to pick up on your thoughts later.

> For them to accept energy must not their Quantum State also change?
> When you accelerate a single neutrally charged atom (thus adding
> energy to it) by some unknown means does it radiate EM radiation?
>

John


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... Radiation to be ... photons knock small dots in light sensitive protographic plates. ... And for Bjoern's energy density of waves it probably holds ... >> work function other than the energy required to remove the electrons ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... Radiation to be ... photons knock small dots in light sensitive protographic plates. ... And for Bjoern's energy density of waves it probably holds ... >> work function other than the energy required to remove the electrons ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?
    ... >>I provide below the answers which are currently accepted in physics. ... >>Electromagnetic radiation. ... Classical mechanics can not fully explain the behaviour of electrons. ... > at the origin (the magnet at rest, not radiating, with closed magnetic ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: OT - Global Warming Revisited
    ... >>>Electromagnetic radiation is made when an atom absorbs energy. ... That leaves only the bound electrons to be impacted. ... For them to accept energy must not their Quantum State also change? ...
    (alt.machines.cnc)
  • The Asymmetry of Radiation
    ... absorbers aren't necessary because there is nothing to absorb. ... electrons are simply responding to the local retarded field. ... space does not radiate electromagnetic energy." ... electron cannot react to any radiation that it emits". ...
    (sci.physics)