Re: 316 stainless
- From: tlipton2@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Sep 2005 20:35:09 -0700
Excellent analysis KG.
So many times as machinists we slow things down when we have a problem
when sometimes speeding things up is what is needed.
I'm no expert I have learned most of what I know by screwing up. The
only thing I claim is that I paid attention when I did screw up.
With that said it might make more sense to abandon the M geometry which
is a medium general purpose chip breaking style and go to a more
roughing grade or even a wiper roughing geometry.
Tom Lipton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 316 stainless
- From: Gary H. Lucas
- Re: 316 stainless
- References:
- 316 stainless
- From: Steve Walker
- Re: 316 stainless
- From: Kirk Gordon
- 316 stainless
- Prev by Date: Re: 316 stainless
- Next by Date: Re: 316 stainless
- Previous by thread: Re: 316 stainless
- Next by thread: Re: 316 stainless
- Index(es):