Re: Positional tolerance question
- From: "Kathy" <krzyBUGkathy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:45:15 -0400
"PrecisionMachinisT"
<precisionmachinist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9ZSdnRrTorFJZHLfRVn-2g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> > No I don't believe he is. He's just making a
weak case against the
> > disciplinary action.
>
> Idiot.......
>
> The weak case lies lies entirely in your
incomplete drawing, bogus
> engineering and ineffectual management.
>
> Taken to the next level of absurdity you would
have him needlessly holding
> +/- .0001 on the same "fairly low-tolerance
mechanical parts"
>
> HEY....I GOT A REALLY BRIGHT IDEA....I'll just
have all the workers "guess"
> as to the required tolerances, and if they happen
to guess wrong then I'll
> discipline them........
>
>
ouch
.
- References:
- Positional tolerance question
- From: DJ Bjorklund
- Re: Positional tolerance question
- From: Garlicdude
- Re: Positional tolerance question
- From: DJ Bjorklund
- Re: Positional tolerance question
- From: PrecisionMachinisT
- Positional tolerance question
- Prev by Date: Re: Positional tolerance question
- Next by Date: Re: New Planet!
- Previous by thread: Re: Positional tolerance question
- Next by thread: Re: Positional tolerance question
- Index(es):