Re: Positional tolerance question
- From: Garlicdude <pulsar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:45:09 -0700
DJ Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Not looking for a doctorial thesis on mechanical tolerancing, just an
> opinion. We're machining fairly low-tolerance mechanical parts. A
> machinist disciplined for not checking holes ultimately discovered to
> be off the center-line ~.025 makes the somewhat weak point that there
> was "...no dimension, so what's the tolerance?!"
>
> Cylindrical part
> Cross hole (pictorially on CL) 1.000" from end
>
> In your typical "three place means +/-.005" situation is location
> tolerance about the CL a function of the OD, .875 in this case, thus
> +/-.005,...or even perhaps +/-.0025 ?
>
> E-mail is fine, thanks
Are you or your machinist intermingling MMC, Maximum Material Condition
, and RFS, Regardless of Feature Size, which are used with a True
Position callout and Ordinate Dimensioning??
MMC and RFS don't apply in ordinate type dimensioning.
--
Regards,
Steve Saling
aka The Garlic Dude ©
Gilroy, CA
The Garlic Capital of The World
http://www.pulsareng.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Positional tolerance question
- From: Cliff
- Re: Positional tolerance question
- From: DJ Bjorklund
- Re: Positional tolerance question
- References:
- Positional tolerance question
- From: DJ Bjorklund
- Positional tolerance question
- Prev by Date: Re: G49 cutter lenght offset cancel questions
- Next by Date: Re: my machine stop comunicating
- Previous by thread: Re: Positional tolerance question
- Next by thread: Re: Positional tolerance question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|