Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- From: Char Jackson <none@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:58:55 -0600
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:34:55 +0000 (UTC), Chuck Banshee
<chuckbanshee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:11:22 -0800, miso wrote:
Have you tried http://www.hidemyass.com
As you noted, Craigslist is down for the day (SOPA protest) so I used
that web site above to go to http://whatismyipaddress.com
It returned the following:
IP Information: 74.63.112.153
Suspected Network Sharing Device
ISP: FDCservers.net
City: Chicago, Illinois
I'll try it (on Thursday) though.
I'd be willing to bet what you described earlier will be the case,
that just about any freely available proxy service is going to suffer
the ghost treatment at craigslist. Let us know, though.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- From: Chuck Banshee
- Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- References:
- Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- From: Chuck Banshee
- Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- From: miso
- Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- From: Chuck Banshee
- Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- From: miso
- Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- From: Chuck Banshee
- Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- Prev by Date: Re: O/T: Smartphone network choices for visitor to USA
- Next by Date: Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- Previous by thread: Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- Next by thread: Re: Not a wireless problem, pe se - but a result of a wireless WISP static IP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|