Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: mavigozler <mavigozler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:00:42 GMT
LR <lrme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in alt.internet.wireless:
On 01/03/2009 11:06, mavigozler wrote:
LR<lrme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in alt.internet.wireless:
On 01/03/2009 10:35, me here wrote:
mavigozler wrote:XP which is fully updated and Vista have a checkbox in network
Some columnist at PCWorld recommended "increasing the security" ofThat doesn't sound right to me.
the wireless router against unwanted connections by removing the
option of broadcasting the SSID.
But that means on my host running WinVistaHomePrem, I have to type
in the SSID and network key/passphrase every time, which for me is
an annoyance.
Isn't there a way of getting my host to persist in connecting with
"Unnamed Network" which has the strongest signal of all available
wireless networks? Or is this just the price I have to pay for
"extra security"?
I don't broadcast my ssid, but that does not require the passphrase
to be rekeyed every time - under xp and Ubuntu.
All you should have to do is key in the known ssid name and the
passphrase once and the PC should retain that information.
properties called "connect even if the network is not broadcasting"
and this must be checked.
With my Vista interface, once a successful connection is made giving
the SSID and the key/passphrase authentication, the user is presented
with TWO checkboxes:
"Save this network"
and the "Start this connection automatically"
In saving the network, it saves it to a list of all successfully
connected networks.
But here is the bizarre thing: when Vista sees an available wireless
network broadcasting its SSID, say it's "MyWirelessNet" and it is in
the list, it connect and even adds a new listing entry "MyWirelessNet
2" and it increments each time, despite it being the same network!!
And the same goes for each time I manually connect by giving the SSID
and passphrase...it creates a new entry in the wireless networks
successfully connected table.
I am at a loss to know how Vista arrives at this.
What Vista should be doing is connecting to the network, finding it
as the name in the previously connected networks, and NOT presenting
me with an interface asking me to "Save this network" when it has
already been saved.
This seems to be a Vista flaw, among tens of thousands.
Have you checked the box I referred to?
Some wireless adapters will not work properly with Vista's method of
handling hidden SSID's.
"Currently there are several widely-distributed WLAN drivers which
either do not support or do not work properly with the Vista method of
dealing with non-broadcast SSIDs, including the Intel 3945ABG and the
Broadcom 802.11g Network Adapters.
The Intel 3945ABG adapter is very widely distributed in current laptop
models. The latest Intel driver provides improvement but does not
address all issues with hidden SSIDs encountered when roaming or
resuming from hibernation.
Broadcom does not show any unnamed networks, and they are not planning
to fix this. One of the reasons, besides being low priority for them,
is also to push customers to stop hiding the SSID, which creates a
problem instead of solving it."
<http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2008/02/08/non-broadcast-w
ireless-ssids-why-hidden-wireless-networks-are-a-bad-idea.aspx>
Now you can understand why I posted my problem to here....to learn about
the very things you are telling me in your response.
My notebook is the HP Pavilion dv9500t which comes the the Intel Wireless
WiFi Link 4965AGN. You listed a bunch of exceptions and I suppose I would
guess that my wireless adapter is part of them.
From you and others, I have heard enough to believe that stopping thebroadcast of the SSID is not really a security enhancement and fully an
annoyance.
Thanks.
.
- References:
- Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: mavigozler
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: me here
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: LR
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: mavigozler
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: LR
- Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Next by Date: Re: WDS + WPA + RADIUS problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Next by thread: Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|