Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: LR <lrme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:31:39 +0000
On 01/03/2009 11:06, mavigozler wrote:
LR<lrme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in alt.internet.wireless:
On 01/03/2009 10:35, me here wrote:mavigozler wrote:XP which is fully updated and Vista have a checkbox in network
Some columnist at PCWorld recommended "increasing the security" ofThat doesn't sound right to me.
the wireless router against unwanted connections by removing the
option of broadcasting the SSID.
But that means on my host running WinVistaHomePrem, I have to type in
the SSID and network key/passphrase every time, which for me is an
annoyance.
Isn't there a way of getting my host to persist in connecting with
"Unnamed Network" which has the strongest signal of all available
wireless networks? Or is this just the price I have to pay for
"extra security"?
I don't broadcast my ssid, but that does not require the passphrase to
be rekeyed every time - under xp and Ubuntu.
All you should have to do is key in the known ssid name and the
passphrase once and the PC should retain that information.
properties called "connect even if the network is not broadcasting" and
this must be checked.
With my Vista interface, once a successful connection is made giving the
SSID and the key/passphrase authentication, the user is presented with TWO
checkboxes:
"Save this network"
and the "Start this connection automatically"
In saving the network, it saves it to a list of all successfully connected
networks.
But here is the bizarre thing: when Vista sees an available wireless
network broadcasting its SSID, say it's "MyWirelessNet" and it is in the
list, it connect and even adds a new listing entry "MyWirelessNet 2" and
it increments each time, despite it being the same network!!
And the same goes for each time I manually connect by giving the SSID and
passphrase...it creates a new entry in the wireless networks successfully
connected table.
I am at a loss to know how Vista arrives at this.
What Vista should be doing is connecting to the network, finding it as the
name in the previously connected networks, and NOT presenting me with an
interface asking me to "Save this network" when it has already been saved.
This seems to be a Vista flaw, among tens of thousands.
Have you checked the box I referred to?
Some wireless adapters will not work properly with Vista's method of handling hidden SSID's.
"Currently there are several widely-distributed WLAN drivers which either do not support or do not work properly with the Vista method of dealing with non-broadcast SSIDs, including the Intel 3945ABG and the Broadcom 802.11g Network Adapters.
The Intel 3945ABG adapter is very widely distributed in current laptop models. The latest Intel driver provides improvement but does not address all issues with hidden SSIDs encountered when roaming or resuming from hibernation.
Broadcom does not show any unnamed networks, and they are not planning to fix this. One of the reasons, besides being low priority for them, is also to push customers to stop hiding the SSID, which creates a problem instead of solving it."
<http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2008/02/08/non-broadcast-wireless-ssids-why-hidden-wireless-networks-are-a-bad-idea.aspx>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: mavigozler
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- References:
- Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: mavigozler
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: me here
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: LR
- Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- From: mavigozler
- Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Next by Date: Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Next by thread: Re: Can Host Try Connecting Even With No SSID?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|