Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: seaweedsl <seaweedsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:37:33 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 25, 3:40 pm, LR <l...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It doesn't matter whether it is the family name or not.http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2008/Apr/0250.html
Quote from page:
Chances are that if you own a wireless router which uses a default WEP
or WPA key, such key
can be predicted based on publicly-available information such as the
router's MAC address or SSID. In other words: it's quite likely that
the bad guys can break into your network if you're using the default
encryption key. Thanks to Kevin, our suspicion that such issue exists
on the BT Home Hub has been confirmed (keep reading for more
details!). Our advice is: *use WPA rather than WEP and change the
default encryption key now!*
Maybe I'm missing something, but this link seems to be showing how
using default security settings on your router can leave you
vulnerable.
If so, then I would say that is very much does matter whether it is
the family name or not, if not means leaving the default SSID in
place. In the sense that if you enter your name (or address or
anything else) as SSID, then you are automatically removing the clue
as to which router it is, thus helping increase security a tiny bit.
Certainly no one here would recommend leaving default passwords in
place. Not at all the same thing as we are debating.
Had not thought of that. Considering I'm still on the trailing edge
Given that most people have a cell phone and many are equipped with wifi
it doesn't take much to look at an SSID.
of cell phones, I forgot that wifi enabled phones are common. So yes,
that means they don't need to be be wardriving to see an SSID, which
was one of the first leaps of faith I was trying to make. But that's
peripheral to the argument and does not get me past the next two or
three leaps of faith! It cetainly does not imply that they will be
able to determine passphrase length though, even if that WAS
correlated to household contents value as proposed.
Many people do not change their SSID where I live and over 50% of them
are prefixed "Sky--". In the UK we have started the transition to
digital TV and a number of people have the Sky HD option
<http://packages.sky.com/see/EquipmentSkyHD.aspx>
"Due to high demand for Sky+HD boxes, existing Sky TV customers may have
to wait up to 9 weeks to be installed."
One of the other odd things is that the majority do not run their
routers 24/7 but switch them off when no-one is in the house.This I
would consider more of a risk as they are indicating no-one is at home
when their SSID is not present.
Important observations all, but still making a case for another issue
entirely. You are providing supporting info for the common advice
given here and elsewhere:
Be sure to change your router's default settings: SSID, wifi WPA
security passphrase, router username and PW Taking those simple
steps will avoid all above mentioned scenarios
As far as turning one's router on and off, ok, sure, whatever. Don't
turn it off- maybe it will help trick people who are casing hour house
into thinking you are home if they are doing a wifi based casing
rather than simply watching you.
Again, another argument for another issue.
I would have appreciated the name and address approach a few years ago
as I wouldn't have had windows smashed in place of my neighbour.
Don't understand this one. Are you saying that you believe that your
windows were smashed in due to your SSID having your name and
address?
Cheers,
Steve
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Char Jackson
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- References:
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: John Navas
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Char Jackson
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: John Navas
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Bill Kearney
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: John Navas
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: David Fairbrother
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: seaweedsl
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- From: LR
- Re: Wireless Disconnects
- Prev by Date: Re: Wireless Disconnects
- Next by Date: Re: Ethernet adaptor damage ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Wireless Disconnects
- Next by thread: Re: Wireless Disconnects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|