Re: Fastest Bridging Configuration
- From: DTC <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 23:33:46 -0500
milkspill@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
4. Full-duplex (Not to spec, I know) / transmit on 1 antenna, receive
on another (with difference polarization). Or use multiple radios,
one that transmit on 5 ghz, but receives on 2.4 ghz (is that even
possible?)
We use two 5.8 Gig units at each end with the 22 dBi BBQ grid antennas
on the transmitters to keep them legal and 32 dBi solid dish antennas on
the receivers.
You can use 5.8 Gig, but there are only two non-overlapping channel configurations that you could use: 149 & 162, or 153 & 165, or
possibly three: 149, 157, 165 if you deploy it right. Or you
could use 5.8/2.4 combo.
If reliability is not an issue, you could use any one of lower power
48 - 64 channels at one end, and any one of the higher power 149 - 165
at the other end.
Even with a grid or dish antenna, you need to keep them at least or
about three feet apart to prevent desensing of the receivers.
.
- References:
- Fastest Bridging Configuration
- From: milkspill
- Fastest Bridging Configuration
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastest Bridging Configuration
- Next by Date: What are the "real life" speeds for Wireless N ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastest Bridging Configuration
- Next by thread: PowerLine XE104 adapters - encryption / throughput question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|