Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- From: rico_001@xxxxxxxxxxx (Rico)
- Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:40:30 GMT
In article <D8GdnRhmTIv5VVfanZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bill Kearney" <wkearney99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
its easier and faster to simply unconnect the power lead and coax line
than to open up the box while sitting up on a tower in the dark in the
rain.
And going back to the point of the original thread, such a box wouldn't be
terribly useful anyway. Multiple radios on the outside isn't what he's
after. That and, as I suggested, being able to place the radios
independently, and use situationally appropriate antennae (very likely to be
different) would make a lot more sense.
Right in my case I don't need weather proof beyond the most basic. Indoor
equipment is more then rugged enough. I'm looking for cheap and compact, I
can sacrifice 'reliable/rugged' since as the engineers say you can only
have so many options. When I say I can sacrfice relaible I mean a failure
of a part now and again is not a deal breaker for me in this application.
As long as I can make this work more often then not. Compact is my most
desired feature with cheap a close second.
fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- wireless network to wireless network??
- From: Rico
- Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- From: DTC
- Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- From: Bill Kearney
- Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- From: DTC
- Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- From: Bill Kearney
- Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- From: DTC
- Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- From: Bill Kearney
- wireless network to wireless network??
- Prev by Date: Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- Next by Date: Re: Upload speed
- Previous by thread: Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- Next by thread: Re: wireless network to wireless network??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
