Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- From: arthur-temp-3@xxxxxxx (Arthur Shapiro)
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 04:26:45 GMT
In article <tu4jb2ld34mhj8a0tbnr1gec07iee24j5a@xxxxxxx>, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You rang? I've been wanting to rant on the topic of biquad
construction. There are far too many erronious biquad articles.
So after digesting your pleasantly voluminous message (thank you!), let's see
if I understand. I was really hoping to mount the N jack on the ground plane,
and it sounds like that is OK, even if not universally done in your
references.
But you assert that the critical factor, whether or not the jack is
electrically connected to the ground plane, is that short 15-18mm
gap between the jack and the actual antenna. It HAS to be a piece of coax -
the alternative of two soldered pieces of copper wire or a notched cylinder
of half inch copper pipe will severely detract from performance. Correct? I
assume that's an SWR issue.
And doubtlessly the scraps of cable TV coax I have about the house are the
wrong impedence.
Art
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- From: miso
- Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- References:
- Q: Biquad Antennas
- From: Arthur Shapiro
- Q: Biquad Antennas
- Prev by Date: Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- Next by Date: Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- Previous by thread: Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- Next by thread: Re: Q: Biquad Antennas
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|