Re: ALERT: WPA can be less secure than WEP
- From: "Xiong Chiamiov" <xiong.chiamiov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Jul 2006 16:47:16 -0700
John Navas wrote:
On 3 Jul 2006 17:52:44 -0700, "Xiong Chiamiov"
<xiong.chiamiov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<1151974363.953309.217400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Well, that's why I don't use dictionary words. I have found that
partial 1337 is very useful in this. w3rt3h1337 (we are the leet)
isn't exactly in the dictionary, is it?
True, but can still be attacked with brute force, and 10 characters
isn't long enough to be truly secure.
Yes, but that isn't my actual password. I wouldn't give that up on the
internet, would I?
.
- References:
- ALERT: WPA can be less secure than WEP
- From: John Navas
- Re: ALERT: WPA can be less secure than WEP
- From: Xiong Chiamiov
- Re: ALERT: WPA can be less secure than WEP
- From: John Navas
- ALERT: WPA can be less secure than WEP
- Prev by Date: Re: xp not detecting correct dhcp address
- Next by Date: Re: xp not detecting correct dhcp address
- Previous by thread: Re: ALERT: WPA can be less secure than WEP
- Next by thread: Re: ALERT: WPA can be less secure than WEP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|