Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- From: rico_001@xxxxxxxxxxx (Rico)
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:47:16 GMT
In article <Vdv5g.25676$eR6.12610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Navas <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <6%u5g.57024$Jk3.20639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Mon, 01 May 2006 21:23:22
GMT, rico_001@xxxxxxxxxxx (Rico) wrote:
In article <oTt5g.25280$eR6.18818@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, JohnNavas <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Which ISP? I've not heard of any ISP that blocks Authenticated SMTP ports.
Hmm, you are spokes person for on of them, BellSouth soon to be AT&T blocks
port 25 for residential customers except through their relay. Surpirsed you
didn't know this about your boyz.
Read more carefully: I wrote "Authenticated SMTP ports" (465 in the case of
Google Mail), not the standard SMTP port (25).
And FYI, I have no connection to new at&t, SBC, BellSouth, or any other
carrier.
Well you sure seem to 'love' them, I can of course google up dozens of
posts where you included cingular in your tag.
fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- From: John Navas
- Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- References:
- Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- From: John Navas
- Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- From: Rico
- Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- From: John Navas
- Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- Prev by Date: Re: Radiation from Wireless LAN vs Bluetooth PAN
- Next by Date: Re: Carrier Set in IOS File System
- Previous by thread: Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- Next by thread: Re: Wi-fi and SMTP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|