Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: John Navas <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:55:35 GMT
[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <MPG.1ded5e255c065437989f47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Tue, 22 Nov 2005
17:01:03 GMT, David Taylor <djtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Configuring your own static IP in this context is both rude and A Really Bad
>> Idea(tm), since you then have no way of preventing conflict with some other
>> wireless client. It's especially bad to use an address handed out by DHCP,
>> since that virtually guarantees a conflict.
>
>No it doesn't John. This is a soho network issuing what? half a dozen
>addresses. The likelihood of clashing with an address when choosing one
>over a hundred or so higher is minute as the machines which already have
>a lease will be requesting to renew the same address over and over again
Many (most?) SOHO routers always hand out the lowest available address (as
compared to a round-robin approach), and do change addresses to given clients
under common circumstances (e.g., router restart). This is why such conflict
can and does (as I know from experience in solving such problems) happen.
>and at the moment we're just trying to troubleshoot this.
But if it gets working, then it is likely to be left in place, which is why
it's a bad idea to point down that path. Much better to address the real
problem, the failure of DHCP.
>How many wired networks have their IP addressing scheme "managed" by
>pinging an address to see if it responds, then using that address if it
>doesn't?! Loads. :)
None that are properly managed -- that's another Really Bad Idea.
>> DHCP is failing either because (a) the DHCP server gets hosed or (b) the
>> wireless link is unreliable. The right thing is to fix the real problem, not
>> create a new problem.
>
>I disagree. [SNIP]
Fair enough.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: David Taylor
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- References:
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: Tristán White
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: aljuhani
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: David Taylor
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: Tristán White
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: David Taylor
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: Tristán White
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: David Taylor
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: John Navas
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- From: David Taylor
- Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- Prev by Date: Re: sharing connection
- Next by Date: Free Wireless Network Access
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there any way of forcing it to Acquire Network Address?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|