Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- From: Internet Marketing <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:45:43 -0700
Greetings.
Inline ...
edgy wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:30:58 -0700, Internet Marketing wrote:
Greetings.
Thank you for the unsolicited advice.
So I guess yours is an unsolicited reply? Get used to the unsolicited
advice if you decide to continue posting on usenet.
Your guess is, well, your guess. I would imagine unsolicited advice is
part of life, not just usenet.
1. I am offering real advice. Contact us. We help our clients get out
of sticky situations, and we also help them get into lucrative
situations. http://zerodaymedia.com Internet Marketing
Your grammar. Needs work.
Where exactly does my grammar usage need improvement?
I found it difficult to find a list of your clients on your site. Perhaps
you could post them here?
When we launch, we intend to post a partial list of the clients with
whom we have worked. Due to the nature of some of our services, it
would be counterproductive for us to list a large set of our clients,
but we are still in talks regarding this very topic.
2. Are you serious? If i am following a thread, i do not need to
scroll through the stuff i have already read. If you forget what is
going on in a thread, it is still there for you to refer to, but maybe
consider working on the memory. As i see it, currently, it is not
logical to bottom post.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Yes, I copied that from somewhere.
I am only slightly apologetic for top-posting. If this is a limitation
which you are unable to overcome, then perhaps you should stop reading
e-mail, and various posts on the internet. Something else to consider
is to read the threads, in full, and in order. I do understand that
often a set of time may pass between posts, which may make reading posts
a little more taxing on the mind, but the great thing about this form of
conversation is the ability to easily go back for reference.
3. Without the dashes, your sig is four lines. With the dashes, your
sig is five lines. Use common sense. Practice what you preach.
Dash-Dash-space-carriage return is the delimiter, not the sig.
I know this. However, the "delimiter" still wastes space. Again, if
you are unable to decipher content from a signature, you may have other
issues. This lot seems to be active with petty complainers.
In response to your post, as a whole, stop wasting bandwidth. Keep in
mind, in SEO, what matters is results.
Keep, in mind, what matters, as a whole, in English, wait, hold on, what
other kinds of punctuation are there?
I would venture to state there are as many kinds of punctuation as there
are written languages.
If you ever decide to up your cavalcade dot info sites' ranking in SERPs
and improve the design as well, feel free to contact me.
Since you did not even design your own website I would find it difficult
to trust you to build mine.
To each their own. However, the offer stands.
<snip>
Internet Marketing
Zero Day Media
http://zerodaymedia.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- From: Internet Marketing
- Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- From: Internet Marketing
- Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- From: edgy
- Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- Prev by Date: Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- Next by Date: Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- Previous by thread: Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- Next by thread: Re: Search engines can't see optimised site, but see non-optimised duplicate
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|