Re: More on PR
- From: Big Bill <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:44:23 GMT
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:41:14 -0700, Sam <sam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Now how in the world can a search engine bot judge 'content'? Rating
and judging the content of a site would take thought and computers can't
think on their own. Nor can humans program computers to think on their
own. By 'content' I assume they mean the quality of a site being a good
site versus a bad boring site. Only a human could tell the difference
and even then it's a matter of taste most times. Unless by quality
content they and you are talking about how many internal pages the site
has. So if one uses the SEO Dave method of web site building then a
quality site is one that has 20 billion pages of nothing interesting on
them, just there to get billions of filler pages for backlinks and
Difficult when they don't get indexed in the first place.
er excuse me "webrank" (Gee that makes all the difference).
There's no way bots can determine site content unless content to them
and you means something else other than what content is supposed to mean
such as high quality or interting or even popular for that matter. If
content means using headers, bolding text, using keywords in sneaky
ways, complex linking structure and filler pages then we have a totally
different concept of what site content is all about.
Yup, we do :-)
the home of on-page optimisation.
- Re: More on PR
- From: carlos.lavieri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on PR
- Prev by Date: Re: Google Scapping Pagerank
- Next by Date: Re: Google Scapping Pagerank
- Previous by thread: Re: More on PR
- Next by thread: Re: More on PR