Re: Google friendly URLs?
- From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:59:59 +0100
____/ Ignoramus31024 on Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:36 : \____
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:38:56 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've just reead (based on something that Cutts announced) that underscores
will now be treated as word separators. That changes the game slightly.
That's nice, finally they are coming to their senses.
i
The last time I looked at a dictionary, no word/term had underscored in it. On
the other hand, some contained hyphens, which were certainly not separators.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Warning 0x12C: ispell feels tired
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 114 total, 1 running, 113 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
.
- References:
- Google friendly URLs?
- From: John
- Re: Google friendly URLs?
- From: Ignoramus27155
- Re: Google friendly URLs?
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: Google friendly URLs?
- From: Ignoramus31024
- Google friendly URLs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Google friendly URLs?
- Next by Date: Re: Google friendly URLs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Google friendly URLs?
- Next by thread: Re: Google friendly URLs?
- Index(es):