Re: XHTML problem.
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:34:49 GMT
On 6 Aug 2006 22:04:03 GMT, John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 31 Jul 2006 19:19:36 GMT, John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IE7 looms... (shudder)
I think that's a very very good thing, and hopefully 80% of the IE 6
users upgrade (probably would be like 20% first 3 months, 50% next 6
months, and 80% after 1.5 years after release). And let's hope that
IE7 is not a dead end, but that we can expect 7.1 in 8-16 months.
And that I can find a way to use it with 98SE.
Impossible I am afraid :-)
I'm still not ready to
change - set in my ways!
What does you stop moving to XP? You can configure the user interface in
such a way that it looks a lot like 98SE even.
I have both, one on each machine. So there's no need to upgrade my
98SE machine. Plus, importantly, my aging version of ws_ftp won't work
on XP (I'm told) and it's better than the more recent versions.
BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/marilyn-monroe-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis-orbis/amici-della-luna-glass.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XHTML problem.
- From: John Bokma
- Re: XHTML problem.
- References:
- XHTML problem.
- From: Timm's
- Re: XHTML problem.
- From: John Bokma
- Re: XHTML problem.
- From: Big Bill
- Re: XHTML problem.
- From: John Bokma
- Re: XHTML problem.
- From: Big Bill
- Re: XHTML problem.
- From: John Bokma
- XHTML problem.
- Prev by Date: Re: Google Adding Previously Dropped Pages
- Next by Date: Re: Understanding SEO Factions
- Previous by thread: Re: XHTML problem.
- Next by thread: Re: XHTML problem.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading