Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- From: "Vegas-real-estate-kid" <derrick.wallner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jul 2006 13:17:40 -0700
Maybe it's that I am just way to pessimistic but I cant see relevant
sites possibly sacrificing their PR by providing a link to my site. In
the real world, they will just plagiarize your content..doh!
Unfortunately, I am being pulled to the dark side of the SEO force.
Recipical linking and then sliding out the backdoor to create one way
links. I just don't see it happening any other way. Especially in the
market I am targeting, way to much competition.
There is still time to save the Vegas Kid! How can actively promote my
site so that relevant sites do naturally link to me?
Vegas-Kid
http://www.summerlin-las-vegas-real-estate.com
canadafred wrote:
Vegas-real-estate-kid wrote:
1) Of course, everyone says the best way to get to the top is build a
comprehensive site w/ unique content that people will naturally link
to. (cough cough, BS, cough, cough)
Actually, it isn't BS. That's the truth Vegas-kid.
People with relative content don't "naturally" one way link to you.
90% of the time you are the competition, and if they have a decent pr,
they know better than to send a one way link to you.
This all depends on the quality of content. If you have exceptional
content people are naturally going to want to link to your content. If
you plan to just throw a bunch of stuff together and call it a web site
then indeed you will need to find ways to manipulate the web content's
importance.
So how do you really get relative sites to one way link to you? The
only solution I see is to pay them. Please, please, please tell me
another way because I cant afford this!!
Outclass the keyphrase competitors with the quality of your content.
2) Outbound links - are they really necessary in the eyes of Google?
If I have zero outbound links is Google going to penalize me for not
linking to relevant content? If so, doesn't that go against the theory
that you should have a comprehensive site? Why not just recreate that
content and store it on your site. Isn't the point to keep the traffic
on your domain?
Whatever is natural. If it is natural that you would want your Internet
visitor to check something else out that may be in continuance or a
semantically congruent extension to your web page's theme then do it.
Wouldn't you want a web site to offer you good more stuff even if it is
elsewhere?
--
Best Regards - Fred
http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- From: Big Bill
- Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- From: Stacey
- Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- From: John Bokma
- Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- References:
- white hat, blah blah blah
- From: Vegas-real-estate-kid
- Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- From: canadafred
- white hat, blah blah blah
- Prev by Date: Re: To hyphen or not to hyphen (Was:Re: Google's Little Devil update)
- Next by Date: Re: To hyphen or not to hyphen (Was:Re: Google's Little Devil update)
- Previous by thread: Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- Next by thread: Re: white hat, blah blah blah
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|