Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS


Nikita the Spider wrote:
In article <e9gftq$gp1$02$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Nikita the Spider" <NikitaTheSpider@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NikitaTheSpider-C5C0E7.11094117072006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
..
In article <44bb8a2e$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Timmermans" <steventimmermans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"canadafred" <canadian_web@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153140648.145829.66500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


<b> is deprecated, <strong> is the way to go outside CSS

Hi Fred,
I agree with your advice, but the word "deprecated" has specific
meaning, usually that the feature in question will be removed in the
future. This isn't the case with <b>.



It was Timmermans who said it was depreciated. I know sometimes it gets kind
of hard to follow who says what. Normally if it is somehow speaking about
fish and doobies it will be Fred.:-)


Ah Stace, there you are.

"Depreciated" is another matter entirely! I am not a tax accountant and
am therefore unqualified to comment. ;)

Apologies to Fred; thanks to Stacey for the correction.

Yes indeed, I bring new dimensions to the term fish fry.

--
Polar Bear Express Canoe Expeditions Shuttle Service
a service of aka Johnny Bait's Minnows and Worms
http://fly-in-fishing.blogspot.com/2006/07/polar-bear-express-canoe-expeditions.html

.