Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Nikita the Spider <NikitaTheSpider@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:04:44 GMT
In article <e9gftq$gp1$02$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Nikita the Spider" <NikitaTheSpider@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NikitaTheSpider-C5C0E7.11094117072006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
..
In article <44bb8a2e$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Timmermans" <steventimmermans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"canadafred" <canadian_web@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153140648.145829.66500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<b> is deprecated, <strong> is the way to go outside CSS
Hi Fred,
I agree with your advice, but the word "deprecated" has specific
meaning, usually that the feature in question will be removed in the
future. This isn't the case with <b>.
It was Timmermans who said it was depreciated. I know sometimes it gets kind
of hard to follow who says what. Normally if it is somehow speaking about
fish and doobies it will be Fred.:-)
"Depreciated" is another matter entirely! I am not a tax accountant and
am therefore unqualified to comment. ;)
Apologies to Fred; thanks to Stacey for the correction.
--
Philip
http://NikitaTheSpider.com/
Whole-site HTML validation, link checking and more
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Stacey
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: canadafred
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- References:
- <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Paul
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: canadafred
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Timmermans
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Nikita the Spider
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Stacey
- <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Prev by Date: Re: Amazing search tool
- Next by Date: Re: Does hosting location make difference for search results?
- Previous by thread: Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Next by thread: Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|