Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: "Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:03:55 +0200
"Nikita the Spider" <NikitaTheSpider@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NikitaTheSpider-C5C0E7.11094117072006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <44bb8a2e$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Timmermans" <steventimmermans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"canadafred" <canadian_web@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153140648.145829.66500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul wrote:
Do you think the search engines are intelligent to "see" that text is
still
bold using a CSS decleration in an external style ***, or is it best
to
use a <b> tag for keywords occasionally ?
I vote for <b>
<b> is deprecated, <strong> is the way to go outside CSS
Hi Fred,
I agree with your advice, but the word "deprecated" has specific
meaning, usually that the feature in question will be removed in the
future. This isn't the case with <b>.
It was Timmermans who said it was depreciated. I know sometimes it gets kind
of hard to follow who says what. Normally if it is somehow speaking about
fish and doobies it will be Fred.:-)
Stacey
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Nikita the Spider
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- References:
- <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Paul
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: canadafred
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Timmermans
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Nikita the Spider
- <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Prev by Date: Re: Listing in European domestic Search Results
- Next by Date: Re: Am I over using keywords on this website
- Previous by thread: Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Next by thread: Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Index(es):