Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:53:26 -0500
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:01:32 +0800, "Timmermans"
<steventimmermans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"canadafred" <canadian_web@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153140648.145829.66500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This one has had me pondering for a while.
Do you think the search engines are intelligent to "see" that text is
still
bold using a CSS decleration in an external style ***, or is it best to
use a <b> tag for keywords occasionally ?
I vote for <b>
<b> is deprecated, <strong> is the way to go outside CSS
<b> and <strong> are not the same thing.
--
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: John Bokma
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: canadafred
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- References:
- <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Paul
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: canadafred
- Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- From: Timmermans
- <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Prev by Date: Re: Google doesn't seem to be ubject to the same rules as everyone else
- Next by Date: Amazing search tool
- Previous by thread: Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Next by thread: Re: <b> tags vs bold CSS
- Index(es):