Re: Importance of HTML 4.01 Transitional Validation

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:17:03 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:51:23 -0500, Paul
<lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:47:12 GMT, ato_zee@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


On 11-Jul-2006, Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

As for my opinion on this topic, I think validation is important... if
there's two sites with equal values, one validates and the orther doesn't,
then surely the validated one should have the uper hand.

Should - logically. Reality, no.

Disagree. Google for one seems to dislike sites that don't
validate and can crash some browsers.

really ? so what are there many sites in #1 position that do not
validate ?

There are also sites that are #1 that do validate.

Would you direct someone to a site that could crash
their browser?

Not all sites with invalid code crash browsers.

Who said they did? You're just having bad day, aren't you Paul :-)

BB

Just for a laugh, I typed in SEO expert into google.
I tried the first three on the list for validation. ALL failed. Didn't
bother trying any more, but I guarantee most, if not all on the 1st
page of results will have error/warnings against them.

Personally, I think a site should be given brownie points for valid
code. Reality states otherwise.
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.

Relevant Pages