Re: site: operator fubar again
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:55:19 GMT
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:35:42 +0200, tonnie <t.prasing@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Brian Wakem schreef:
tonnie wrote:
catherine yronwode schreef:
John Bokma wrote:That my dear is nothing compared to what i got:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ajohnbokma.comYou think that's funny? Try this one!:
Results 1 - 10 of about 10,100 from johnbokma.com
Probably too busy with all the new toys.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=site%3Agoogle.com
Results 1 - 10 of about 10,900,000
What's with that, eh?
Results 1 - 10 of about 57,600,000
Poor effort.
Results 1 - 10 of about 73,800,000 from google.com
The effort made was sincere and good, the results given by google not. :(
By the way, you have beaten John by just 100K.
Who bids more?
75,400,000
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-services.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/baby-gund/index.html
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/jules-cheret-posters.htm
.
- References:
- site: operator fubar again
- From: John Bokma
- Re: site: operator fubar again
- From: catherine yronwode
- Re: site: operator fubar again
- From: tonnie
- Re: site: operator fubar again
- From: Brian Wakem
- Re: site: operator fubar again
- From: tonnie
- site: operator fubar again
- Prev by Date: Re: site: operator fubar again
- Next by Date: Re: site: operator fubar again
- Previous by thread: Re: site: operator fubar again
- Next by thread: Re: site: operator fubar again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|