Re: XOR and Google?


Brian Wakem wrote:

<quote>
Focus your search by using several search operators. For example,
[ intext:e-mail intitle:security -site:microsoft.com ] finds pages whose
titles contain the word "security," with the word "e-mail" on the text of
the page and not on the site microsoft.com.
</quote>

A little below the belt perhaps?

BTW your sig separator is invalid.


--
Brian Wakem
Email: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/b.wakem/myemail.png

Yeah, I like how Google pokes fun every once and awhile.

Can you point me to a web page that has rules on the sig? Even being a
moderator I couldn't find any reference to it and found out that
everyone has a different opinion on it.

--

Michael Rock
(Google Groups Moderator)
Web Ranking Consultants - http://www.webrankingconsultants.com
Web Development Contractor - http://www.theinternetpresence.com
Chat with me at -
http://www.theinternetpresence.com/chat/livesupport.php

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: XOR and Google?
    ... Brian Wakem schreef: ... Focus your search by using several search operators. ... BTW your sig separator is invalid. ... Usenet Signature Convention ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: XOR and Google?
    ... Brian Wakem wrote: ... Focus your search by using several search operators. ... BTW your sig separator is invalid. ... It's difficult to find an authoritative reference as there is no RFC, ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: XOR and Google?
    ... Brian Wakem wrote: ... Focus your search by using several search operators. ... BTW your sig separator is invalid. ... moderator I couldn't find any reference to it and found out that ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: XOR and Google?
    ... Brian Wakem wrote: ... Focus your search by using several search operators. ... BTW your sig separator is invalid. ... It's difficult to find an authoritative reference as there is no RFC, ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)