Re: Page Rankling
- From: David <seodave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:01:29 GMT
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:11:29 +0200, davidof
<david.george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Borek wrote:
How much do they offer? :)
I thought about proposing to do some SEO for them but I'm too busy at
the mo. It shouldn't take too much to knock me out as the page is not
SEOd, it is just their site is poor.
How long before law suits start to fly for this sort of thing though?
Especially where trademarks are involved.
I've been threatened with court action for similar stuff. Really funny
when it happens :-))
Not exactly the same, but one I like was the Trashy Lingerie SERP
which my site was number 2 for, the number one site has a trademark
fro this phrase and threatened legal action. So I removed all
instances of the phrase, but used other forms of SEO to keep 2nd place
for quite sometime (until the whole site was banned for another reason
:-)).
I was wanting number 1 without using the phrase just out of
principle!!
David
--
Meta Tags, why bother
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/meta-tags-optimization.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Page Rankling
- From: davidof
- Re: Page Rankling
- References:
- Page Rankling
- From: davidof
- Re: Page Rankling
- From: davidof
- Page Rankling
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this the correct way to fix canonical domain issues in .htaccess?
- Next by Date: a twist on personalized news/targeted advertising?
- Previous by thread: Re: Page Rankling
- Next by thread: Re: Page Rankling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|