Re: pagerank gone on sub-pages


tonnie schreef:

Juul wrote:
because it's the only place where people are following this from the
beginning(8 march).

Yeah right.

Me so sorry that you don't know nothing about it and still responding


If you don't like that he gets an answer elsewhere ...

That is not what i asked.

little child


BTW : didn't i say that others see this also? So i responded correctly,
not?

Afraid you didn't respont properly? Why? Because you didn't?

no, tired of answering people like you. I responded very correct, i am
following these issues the last month(s). And you? Are you following
the problems? I saw your post at Matt Cutts blog. Did you read it
again? Did you think about it? Because what you said there is very
foolish. How can Google penalize sites who abuse dynamic content. They
can't because they would punish sites who don't abuse it(example CNN or
other newssites).

Perhaps you can start thinking in place off just starting a discussion
that has nothing to do with the OP.


I didn't ask you that, it is a question you are now asking yourselve.
Why that?

little child

Am i wrong in giving a link where he can others or more information?
Why do you reply? I gave him an answer, you didn't

Jumpy aint you! This most of the time indicates that there is something
wrong.

This is usenet JUUL. If you don't like what you get here, bad luck.

i'm not here for you. I'm intrested in the OP and his post.
Are you the Master of usenet?


And i could have answered the same you did, Yes i see it. And what
benefit does OP have from just stating i see it?

"Anyoe else seeing this?"

What does he ask? I am the only one who responded the question ...


Canadafred asked him a question, a good question from my point of view,
so i am going to wait until OP has answered that, not just going to
repeat it or even sending him elsewhere.


the question is good but isn't going to clear out the problems OP is
seeing.
His PR dramatically changed to zero or nothing. Wanna bet that he still
has his position in SERP's? (bet ! bet ! bet!)


--
Website design:
http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Search engine optimization:
http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html

It seems to me that you only post for putting your links here

@ Bill
i don't say i have a solution. I just give a link to a place where
people also see this and other problems @ google.
And yes they visit it here also, especially if it is intresting but
with posters like Tonnie it is very difficult to get intrested here.
Barbara is even worser

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: semi-OT blackjack question
    ... several 'hole card' situations might not be intuitive. ... A child could have figured that out. ... If I recall we agreed never to read and/or respond to each other's posts. ... "popinjay" was responding to me. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Die, die, die.
    ... child over the head and fracture his skull when a child calls him ... I was responding to the blaming of the ... or are you another one saying that a child can do no harm? ... Its a bit late to worry about whether its acceptable behaviour after you've ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Die, die, die.
    ... child over the head and fracture his skull when a child calls him ... has told me to fuck off. ... I was responding to the blaming of the ... or are you another one saying that a child can do no harm? ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Die, die, die.
    ... child over the head and fracture his skull when a child calls him ... has told me to fuck off. ... I was responding to the blaming of the ... or are you another one saying that a child can do no harm? ...
    (uk.legal)