Re: 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- From: John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Apr 2006 14:57:41 GMT
tonnie <t.prasing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Bokma wrote:
[ ... ]
As far as I know, 304's are normal.
That's what i thought to, but in the past it didn't get a 304, and for
the robots.txt it still doesn't.
All bots requesting robots.txt get a 200 and that file didn't change
either. ??
The 304 is a response generated by the webserver. You (probably) haven't
changed a thing. What might have changed is that Googlebot now with it's
request sends extra info, to which the server replies 304 (Nothing has
changed, everything is the same). I can check older files I have, but to
me a 304 is nothing weird or so but I don't know when Googlebot started to
send conditional requests (I hope from the very beginning, since it saves
bandwidth). You're not going to drop, etc. because of this.
--
John Freelance Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/
Creating a customized Command Prompt shortcut:
http://johnbokma.com/windows/command-prompt-shortcut.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- From: tonnie
- Re: 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- References:
- html/xhtml
- From: Catherine Milton
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: John Bokma
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: Catherine Milton
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: John Bokma
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: Catherine Milton
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: Catherine Milton
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: tonnie
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: John Bokma
- Re: html/xhtml
- From: tonnie
- 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- From: John Bokma
- Re: 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- From: tonnie
- html/xhtml
- Prev by Date: Re: html/xhtml
- Next by Date: Re: 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- Previous by thread: Re: 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- Next by thread: Re: 304 ( was Re: html/xhtml)
- Index(es):