Re: Site dropped to PR4

Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 5 Apr 2006 17:31:34 GMT, John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

suspicious, part of their initiative to stop spyware and so forth,
ostensibly, but, like I said, it basically categorises competition
as no-good-ware and refuses to allow its installation. That's what I
think I'm looking at, hence my monopoly comments the other day.

No, you're looking at a firewall that doesn't allow connections be
made by programs you haven't allowed to do so. Has nothing to do with
Microsoft enforcing a monopoly.

Yet, I turn them all off. Same things happen. My unfamiliarity with XP
no doubt plays a part in this though.

what happens if you enter:

http://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-1.5.0.1&os=win&lang=en-US
in your browser?

If you get an error, what is the exact error?

--
John Freelance Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/

Quick Bookmarks:http://johnbokma.com/firefox/quick-launch-bookmarks.html
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Site dropped to PR4
    ... as no-good-ware and refuses to allow its installation. ... what is the exact error? ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Site dropped to PR4
    ... ostensibly, but, like I said, it basically categorises competition as ... no-good-ware and refuses to allow its installation. ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Site dropped to PR4
    ... ostensibly, but, like I said, it basically categorises competition as ... no-good-ware and refuses to allow its installation. ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Site dropped to PR4
    ... ostensibly, but, like I said, it basically categorises competition as ... no-good-ware and refuses to allow its installation. ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Site dropped to PR4
    ... ostensibly, but, like I said, it basically categorises competition as ... no-good-ware and refuses to allow its installation. ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)