Re: Contemplating a Cuttlet
- From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 05:47:44 +0100
__/ [ Big Bill ] on Friday 31 March 2006 00:28 \__
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:45:32 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
__/ [ canadafred ] on Thursday 30 March 2006 20:16 \__
Hello
When discussion the NOFOLLOW, Matt commented ".. if you sell links, you
should mark them with the nofollow tag. Not doing so can affect your
reputation ..."
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/q-a-thread-march-27-2006/
* Google 'invent' rel="nofollow"
* Other crawlers follow suit
* Google require the use of rel="nofollow"
* Google penalise for no use of rel="nofollow"
* Without crawlers obeying the route, why would anyone buy/sell links
Traffic. Original point of the exercise. One that wouldn't be affected
by nofollow.
Yes, of course. I left it aside only to support an argument (critique).
.
- References:
- Contemplating a Cuttlet
- From: canadafred
- Re: Contemplating a Cuttlet
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: Contemplating a Cuttlet
- From: Big Bill
- Contemplating a Cuttlet
- Prev by Date: Re: Illegal Immigration, the Non-Issue of the Week??????????????
- Next by Date: Re: Internally linking between pages. .
- Previous by thread: Re: Contemplating a Cuttlet
- Next by thread: Re: Contemplating a Cuttlet
- Index(es):