Re: Site maps

Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:51:58 -0700, hug
<contact_info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Borek <m.borkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:27:49 +0100, Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You have a misconception of what the Google site map is.

I'm seconding this too Hugs. I wondered if maybe I was reading it
wrong but if two folk with such diverse opinion on written English as
me and Stacey can agree that you're wrong then I'd have to say, on
balance, you'd be wrong there, no foolin'.

Count me in - that's third kind of English, and I need occasionally help
to understand both you and Stacey :)

Best,
Borek

"Let me say this about that, and let me be perfectly clear."

I have never claimed to be an SEO expert. I read the OP's post about
sitemaps and tried to help as best I could. Stacey apparently needs
an ego boost and gets insulting. Others jump into the mix. What a
mess.

I was posting about sitemaps in general, as it turns out the OP was
asking about a specific kind of google input. So there was talking
going on at cross purposes because of my misunderstanding, failure to
read carefully, whatever you wish to call it -- after a while reading
posts some of them are so strangely written (lots of folks in
newsgroup are not native english speakers)

We get a few that don't seem native to the planet...

that it can be difficult to
tell whether the poster is asking about something you don't know about
or asking in broken/strange english. So it goes.

Google seems well on its way to running the internet. First it enters
the scene as the best search engine around (sometime late in the last
century as I recall, but I'm not good on dates). Then it putrifies
itself with ad content and what appear to be paid priority listings.
Now it's apparently intent on having everyone submit a sitemap...

doesn't say you have to..I think myself that it's trying to encourage
the information out there to present itself as more engine-friendly.

BB

You could be right... you probably are right. I feel about google the
way a man might feel about a lover who he found out makes a few bucks
on the side as a whore; google was *so* good in the begininning, and
now it's *so* commercial. I despise Microsoft for what it made of the
industry in order to reap nearly-untold wealth when it could have done
*so* much more to advance the art. Idealists are diseased, but noone
will put us out of our misery. So it goes.

--
http://www.ren-prod-inc.com/hug_soft/store.php?action=contact
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Arthur Clarkes humorous stories
    ... If you are reading this under Google ... how could we English ever truly ... appreciate our own superiority, if there ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Site maps
    ... I wondered if maybe I was reading it ... wrong but if two folk with such diverse opinion on written English as ... Count me in - that's third kind of English, ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • i cant keep doing this with out help, PLEASE tell People...
    ... Svp si vous ferez ainsi pour les USA, lui, elle ... Google de Cambridge http://www.fordvehicles.com/help/contact/ 12 mar. ... Arabic to English BETAChinese to English BETAChinese (Simplified to ... Arabic BETAEnglish to Chinese BETA English to Chinese ...
    (alt.fan.letterman)
  • Re: Mark Isaak & John Wilkins are frauds
    ... nonhuman ancestors was obviously known before 1858, among English ... you don't know how to use google. ... farther back you go the fewer books were produced and fewer books ... English-speaking scientists were in fact British, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Western and Eastern Medicine Compared
    ... do that lets you google things all day? ... and, just for your information, for several folk here - perhaps many - ... tablet to tablet in Ma huang and sida cordifolia, and pinellia, shipment to ... history and tradition, but that doesn't outweigh the opportunistic and ...
    (alt.med.fibromyalgia)