Re: Title attribute in link
- From: "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:32:16 +0100
Big Bill wrote:
In a volatile environment, one would be foolish to trust any source
absolutely. As I write an engine may be programming to take note of
the attributes under discussion. For now, though, personally, I won't
be using the technique you describe.
Well, if you're concerned a title attribute may be considered spam..., I think you can't be serious.
What the bloody hell are you on about?
Sorry, maybe I did misinterpret you. Here is how I read you:
"As I write an engine may be programming to take note of [my interpretation: to consider spam] the attributes under discussion [the title attribute]. For now, though, personally, I won't be [i think I better avoid] using the technique you describe".
Upon re-reading you, I see that you possibly didn't mean to say that at all. Well, such are the pitfalls of on-line communication :)
Apart from that, I do experience myself the spam paranoia effect I described. I have a page where I want to temporarily remove a sentence. In the past, I would have made the paragraph invisible. Now I'm starting to get nervous: Will Google punish me if I do that?
--
Gregor mit dem Motorrad auf Reisen:
http://hothaus.de/greg-tour/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Title attribute in link
- References:
- Title attribute in link
- From: John
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: John
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Greg N.
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Big Bill
- Title attribute in link
- Prev by Date: Re: One large site, or more smaller ones?
- Next by Date: Re: (Article) Germans want to charge Google
- Previous by thread: Re: Title attribute in link
- Next by thread: Re: Title attribute in link
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|