Re: Title attribute in link
- From: "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:11:08 +0100
Big Bill wrote:
In a volatile environment, one would be foolish to trust any source
absolutely. As I write an engine may be programming to take note of
the attributes under discussion. For now, though, personally, I won't
be using the technique you describe.
Well, if you're concerned a title attribute may be considered spam..., I think you can't be serious.
Are we all now starting to suffer SE spam paranoia? Are the W3C HTML specs now being rewritten by Google?
A tiny bit of text written in background color - deadly! CSS attributes "overflow:hidden; display:none; text-size:1px; " - outlawed! TITLE or ALT attributes of more than three words - evil!
As I said, you can't be serious. As long there is no obvious, blatant spam attempt (like the 1200 hidden spam words on www_rob-james_com), valid HTML should is just that: valid.
--
Gregor mit dem Motorrad auf Reisen:
http://hothaus.de/greg-tour/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: canadafred
- Re: Title attribute in link
- References:
- Title attribute in link
- From: John
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: John
- Re: Title attribute in link
- From: Big Bill
- Title attribute in link
- Prev by Date: What's up with this re-direct?
- Next by Date: Re: search-function for commercial websites with google/yahoo
- Previous by thread: Re: Title attribute in link
- Next by thread: Re: Title attribute in link
- Index(es):