Re: not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- From: "Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 05:06:43 +0100
"catherine yronwode" <cat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43BF201B.B096C179@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
>
> Thank you for the correction, Stacey. As i keep mentioning, i am
> visually impaired and can't always see what i have typed -- or typoed.
> :-)
>
> cat yronwode
> http://www.southern-spirits.com
> Hoodoo in the Federal Writers Project Ex-Slave Narratives
Oh, no problem. Just tells you I tried to go and got a 404 and then noticed
the misspelling myself.:-)
.
- References:
- not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- From: catherine yronwode
- Re: not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- From: John Bokma
- Re: not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- From: catherine yronwode
- Re: not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- From: Stacey
- Re: not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- From: catherine yronwode
- not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- Prev by Date: Re: Critisizing other SEO's
- Next by Date: Re: The value of Wikipedia links?
- Previous by thread: Re: not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- Next by thread: Re: not exactly a conspiracy theory, but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|