Re: Bad Hosting Company
- From: Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 23:36:53 +0000
GameWyrd wrote:
>For cost effective hosting it must simply be: www.[snip]
>If you're looking for something robust and dedicated then, again, it
>must be: www.[snip]
Nonsense. There are many good choices other than the ones you list.
I like OC Hosting <http://www.ochosting.com/> but there are many, many
other good choices.
BTW, here are some references for those who are interested
in improving the quality of their posts to newsgroups:
"When thou enter a city, abide by its customs." -The Talmud
Quoting Style in Newsgroup Postings
http://www.xs4all.nl/%7ewijnands/nnq/nquote.html
How do I quote correctly in usenet?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html
Common Mistakes in Usenet Postings and How to Avoid Them
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/mail-news-errors.html#quoting
Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html
Why bottom-posting is better than top-posting
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
+What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/quote.html
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Check keyword density for URL with https
- Next by Date: Re: New Web Standards SEO Analyzer Tool
- Previous by thread: Re: Daily Crawlers Breakdown
- Next by thread: Re: Bad Hosting Company
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading