Re: Song

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:22:31 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>__/ [Samz] on Friday 16 December 2005 04:36 \__
>
>> David wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Did you not notice the "Sig Heil!!! Sig Heil!!!" or are you just being
>>> your usual hypocritical self?
>>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz do you really want to be associated with the Nazis?
>>>
>>> Very, very sad.
>>>
>>> David
>>
>>
>> I wasn't sig heiling the nazis I was sig heiling you Dave after reading
>> all those horrible nasty vicious and arrogant things you wrote about
>> Roy. Sounded a lot like some other nasty vicious things that a certain
>> infamous nazi with a funny moustache said years ago about a certain
>> group of people. When the shoe fits wear it by all means and expect some
>> BS in return. Your problem Dave is that seem to think there is only one
>> right way to SEO and the one right way is your way and that's your
>> problem along with you not being able to handle any differences of
>> opinion from other or criticisms from others. Your ego is too inflated
>> and you need to de-flate a bit if you want to win friends and influence
>> people.
>
>Thanks for the defence. It's much very appreciated because I had no inten-
>tion spending more time on this. I often wonder why I ended up spending
>time stroking the keyboard for a notorious man to read. This will, in
>fact, be my last post on this topic.

Now I'm notorious, what next a baby killer!!

>Mucking one's name doesn't take much effort and given Dave's details, e.g.
>
> David Law
> PO Box 446
> Grimsby, DN32 7WZ
> GB

Although that's a PO Box and freely available online it's generally
considered bad form to post addresses. I am surprised you did that,
makes you look bad and not the best way to go to look good online.

>it doesn't take much to spoil 'reputation' or hurt feelings.

You mean like for no good reason calling someone a pathological liar-

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.internet.search-engines/msg/45de29f914ba28e2

"I am skeptic as you have been proven in the past to be a pathological
liar. No offence intended, but Bill could say a little more. That's
his job in this newsgroup, which keeps it entertaining -- a network of
partners, reciprocity, and foes."

> By following
>the path which Dave has chosen to take, not only has he destroyed the
>parts of the World Wide Web,

Destroyed, examples please?

>but also he offended many people who stood in
>his way and politely tried to persuade him that what he did was unethical.

I consider someone who calls another unethical yet goes around
infringing the copyright works of others unethical.

>Some stepped aside (no need to mention names here), but in the meantime,
>even though I opted for silence, somebody chose to stip up 'noise' and at-
>tack a certain someone with derogatory subject lines. Fine. I join an end-
>less list of people who stand for something, e.g.
>
>http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?num=50&hl=en&q=peter%20kohlmann&spell=1&sa=N&tab=wg
>http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?hl=en&num=50&q=rex+ballard&qt_s=Search
>http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?hl=en&num=50&q=john+bailo&qt_s=Search

Please explain how the posts I'm making are any different to this post
you made
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.internet.search-engines/msg/45de29f914ba28e2
except mine are true with supporting arguments and yours is just a
blanket accusation with no evidence?

>There is no need to repeat the arguments and I don't feel like writing
>lengthy posts. The trails are there to be found. If I wanted, I could use
>acquaintances with Google staff (including a top executive) and provide a
>list of splogs and the many corresponding domains that Dave owns.

Are you threatening to get a high up Google employee to help you to
hurt my sites rankings Roy? Sounds a little evil to me and Google
isn't supposed to do anything evil.

I've made no threats against your site and the only thing I've
considered doing (considered it way before this and may do one day) is
to issue a DMCA complaint regarding the copyright material of mine on
your website which is my right if I ever choose to take it more
seriously.

> I have
>no interest in that though, but I suggest that Dave ponders what his work
>contributed (or conversely -- how it added corruption) to cyberspace.

This comes across as a subtle threat which I am a little surprised to
see from you (you sound like Sam now!!). Are you really so pig headed
to let this continue for either a basic apology and retraction or to
back your statement up with facts?

All I need from you is this little line-

I have no evidence that Dave has "been proven in the past to be a
pathological liar" so I retract what I said here
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.internet.search-engines/msg/45de29f914ba28e2
and apologise.

Or

Actual facts that I have "been proven in the past to be a pathological
liar".

If you do neither, I'll keep this up indefinitely.

And just to add to your subtle threats, I could create websites bad
mouthing you Roy, but I have no interest in that though, but I
suggest that Roy ponders what his copyright infringing NG mirror posts
contributed (or conversely -- how it added corruption) to cyberspace.

>Again I say, I'm off this topic for good.

Couldn't you apologise or show the facts first, takes one honest post
to end this?

>Roy

As a sign of good faith I didn't change the subject line on this post
nor add your full name all over it. Consider it a one off gift.

David
--
Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Song
    ... > David wrote: ... >> Roy Schestowitz do you really want to be associated with the Nazis? ... Your problem Dave is that seem to think there is only one ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Roy Schestowitz joins Sam with the Nazis: was Re: Davids Song
    ... David wrote: ... Sig Heil!!!" ... > Roy Schestowitz do you really want to be associated with the Nazis? ... I wasn't sig heiling the nazis I was sig heiling you Dave after reading ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Help - brick wall!
    ... Roy, Dave that's me well & truly humiliated, thanks! ... Like I say I am a beginner and really can't afford to travel almost ... No-one was trying to humiliate you - simply pointing out that genealogy, ...
    (soc.genealogy.britain)
  • Re: CDatabase CRecordset - How to get the number of rows?
    ... Best Regards, ... David ... "Roy Fine" wrote: ... > What is the value of dataStr in the CRecordset::Open call. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Domain Name SEO
    ... >>Big Bill wrote: ... Dave reproduces public domain content ... It was patented by Google, so it's likely to be a valid way to discern ... Roy S. Schestowitz ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)