Re: Full path links in second level pages
- From: Els <els.aNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:36:21 +0100
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
> "John Bokma" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> news:Xns972A87179336Ccastleamber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> GB Blanchard <1122@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I just realised I may be doing something
>>> wrong on my sites.
>>>
>>> With SEO in mind, should links in subdirectories be full-path:
>>>
>>> http://www.example.com/example.html
>>>
>>> or relative:
>>>
>>> ../example.html
>>
>> Does it matter to your visitor? No. Gives one more info then the other?
>
>> No. Does using the latter make *your* work easier: yes.
>
> Why should the latter make "my" work easier???
Hmm.. how to explain this to you...
Try it yourself.
Type 10 links in your page full path. Use a stopwatch to see how long
it takes you. Then type 10 links with just ../ before the filename.
Time that too. Which of the two took you the longest?
Besides that, if you'd ever want to (temporarily) move an entire
directory with subdirectories to another place in the site (for
instance from https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/ to
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/ ) you won't have to change any
links inside that directory if you used relative links.
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Now playing: Hawkwind - Silver Machine (live)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Full path links in second level pages
- From: Luigi Donatello Asero
- Re: Full path links in second level pages
- References:
- Re: Full path links in second level pages
- From: John Bokma
- Re: Full path links in second level pages
- From: Luigi Donatello Asero
- Re: Full path links in second level pages
- Prev by Date: Re: Full path links in second level pages
- Next by Date: Re: Full path links in second level pages
- Previous by thread: Re: Full path links in second level pages
- Next by thread: Re: Full path links in second level pages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|