Re: Ping Stacey about what Sam said
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:58:33 GMT
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:58:09 +0100, "Stacey"
<stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Big Bill" <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:01npo15i9faa97pliljf08r66ejoa2k3t3@xxxxxxxxxx
>> That commercial thing is a theory as it would explain what happened to
>> my site. All the poster pages were clearly affiliate-oriented and
>> therefore commercial which could explain what happened.
>
>If commerical sites were losing. I don't see it. My site sells something. I
>also had a little bit of Amazon stuff on it. What I think happened to your
>site is that 1. your PR is to low, 2. you have to much going on the site and
>it was pulling away from the relatedness to SEO. I am still thinking those
>links I mentioned may have some small play in it also.
>
>>Also what you
>> said could explain it, and also what I said could explain it, or it
>> could be all three a bit or something else that hasn't come up yet.
>> But I don't think you can ignore what Sam says, it may be a factor for
>> a lot of sites where perhaps the commercial, by which I mean selling
>> direct from the site, has overtaken the informational, by which I mean
>> merely advising of a service commercially available.
>
>Like I said I don't see it. Do some searches and you will see some sites
>still ranking just fine that are commerical. What you have to look at is why
>just some site losing. Each site probably has different reasons behind why
>it slips down, but surely can't be because of a commerical reason.
>
>Here are a few more examples:
>
>Appliances:
>http://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&rls=SNYC%2CSNYC%3A2004-20%2CSNYC%3Aen&q=appliances
>Look at who is still at top. They are still there and will probably stay
>there. They are kings of appliances. They are very commerical.
>
>Kitchen Accessories:
>http://www.google.com/search?q=kitchen+accessories&btnG=Search&num=20&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&rls=SNYC%2CSNYC%3A2004-20%2CSNYC%3Aen
>Just look at those also. Bed and Bath, Lehmans, etc all commerical and have
>been there for a while also.
Have been there for a while. Established. Have provenance, harking
back to what I was saying about what Google respects a while back.
These sites are established in their serps as what they are. Mine had
been through a shift in status from one kind of site to another. Mind,
it still contained far far more relevant material than a lot of sites
currently ranking higher so I think I'm on the way back.
To return to my point, though, I wonder, were Sam's sites all purely
affiliate or were they built round informational sites with steady
serps?
We dunno and he won't tell us, I imagine.
>Like I have said before I haven't dropped with any of them except Florida
>and it was just for a little bit of time. My site is commerical isn't it?
Yes and it's established as such and in the field of commercial sites
it retained its position. How about the ratios of info sites to
commercial sites in the serps, did that change, with loads of info
sites magically appearing at the top of the serps and
commercially-oriented sites plunging? Sounds a bit that way, doesn't
it? I'm suggesting maybe your site stayed at the top as there weren't
loads of quality pure info sites available for your precise serps.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The buffalo have gone
.
- References:
- Ping Stacey about what Sam said
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Ping Stacey about what Sam said
- From: Stacey
- Ping Stacey about what Sam said
- Prev by Date: Re: Ping Stacey about what Sam said
- Next by Date: Re: google 封杀一个网站有几种类型
- Previous by thread: Re: Ping Stacey about what Sam said
- Next by thread: Re: google 封杀一个网站有几种类型
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
