Re: jagger ibls and obls?


Big Bill wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:20:03 -0000, "mark | r"
> <trooperbill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >hi there,
> >
> >still reading jagger news online.. theres some mass speculation that googles
> >detecting display nones in CSS files and discounting the text therein..
>
> Where are you reading it? I settled at the Ihelpyou forums where,
> improbably, they seem to agree with me about things.
>
> >more to the point should i run through my OBL's and IBL's and delete all
> >that dont reference my keyword? "jewellery" this would mean getting rid of
> >"jewelry" and all other link texts ?
> >
> >mark
>
> I thought you'd come back up in the rankings? Anyway, it's way too
> soon to draw definitive conclusions from what little evidence we have.
> My site's still going up and down like a yo-yo and there are ongoing
> absurdities observable at the top of the serps (like, f'rinstance, me
> not there) that I doubt very much will last.
> Grab a brush, jump in a cab and help me finish painting the kitchen,
> that'd be something useful for you to do.
>
> BB
> --
> www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The buffalo have gone

its depressing, thats all - where you at, im free weekends :)

mark

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: jagger ibls and obls?
    ... theres some mass speculation that googles ... > detecting display nones in CSS files and discounting the text therein.. ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: jagger ibls and obls?
    ... >still reading jagger news online.. ... >detecting display nones in CSS files and discounting the text therein.. ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)