OK, here's some stuff...



I'm reading one of Mike Grehan's columns (again) and he
retrospectively seems to be letting rather large cats out of the bag.
Other folks have been suggesting reciprocals are dead, no big surprise
there as blind folk could have predicted it. I think Mr Grehan,
though, is suggesting that the Googs have drawn a bead on link
spamming in general that has a rather more educated eye.
Those of you outside the circle of light made by the fire here who are
of a mathematical bent might want to pack your slide rules and
protractors and head off to

http://dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/showDoc.Fulltext?lang=en&doc=2005-33&format=pdf&compression=&name=2005-33.pdf

where if you can grasp it is a big paper on how Google have identified
people who have PR artificially gained.
Note this quote, with reference to me, the fabled SEO practitioner
with a home page having a PR of 4 and without a Google toolbar (I'm
quoting from said paper);
"Obviously, a node
with a small PageRank is not a beneficiary of considerable boosting,
so it is of no interest to us."
But, Mr Grehan in his piece states;
"PageRank, for instance, is never used the way people think it is.
But as long as people think it's a major influence in the ranking
process, the easier it is for Google to use that to its advantage.
As I've said before, doesn't it appear a little suspect when the enemy
leaves you ammunition? It's bound to backfire. Buying and selling
links based on PageRank's global scale is a wonderful breadcrumb trail
for Google."
The rest of it is at
http://www.clickz.com/experts/search/results/article.php/3563751

Well, I never was particularly enamoured of Page Rank. It's looking
like I was probably right not to be swept up in it.
None of which explains why my site should get banished to the outer
regions, though. Unless somewhere, despite I've never traded or bought
links based on PR, and I've only ever bought maybe three links from
plain vanilla directories, somewhere there's a breadcrumb trail
leading, albeit inadvertently, to me.

BB







--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The buffalo have gone
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: *** Post of the Month for July 2005: Vote Now!
    ... >> Tristan Miller wrote: ... The Google URL is more likely to ... >> You are suggesting a valid method for documenting posts, ... > as a news reader. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: atomic orbitals program
    ... Greetings folks. ... I see no "contradiction" here Uncle Al. ... valid models for modeling "3D atomic orbitals", ... Google could use a program like this ...
    (sci.physics)
  • A Tearful Farewell.....
    ... "Jeezus H. Christ Don! ... Google doesn't enter by context, ... I've even worried, and prayed for sick RORTers, as they recovered, ... I don't know how I'll get through the day without you folks? ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: OT Computer help for Cranky Pants Polly
    ... but most folks who've never heard of it might of seen/recognize google ... AOL, I found it again. ... seems most folks just never heard of usenet. ... google groups will get their attention as a rule. ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.quilting)
  • Re: Why is sheet music so complicated
    ... I find the subject of historical evolution of notation ... Press another button on Google ... So I am not at all suggesting ... passion and loyalty to a 150 year old system of note reading. ...
    (rec.music.theory)