Re: seo uk
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:36:11 GMT
On 14 Nov 2005 01:58:30 GMT, John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From a site going to Bill's page. To many I think BTW for Google to
>> like it isn't like it is his site going to another page on his site
>> but another site giving him to much at one time to artifical.
>
>So basically I can harm your site with adding just 800 links to your site
>from mine? Doubt it.
The key difference between that and what Stacey suggests may be
happening is the obl from me to them, whoever they may be, which
implies tacit approval on my part making me a bad guy too.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The buffalo have gone
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: seo uk
- From: John Bokma
- Re: seo uk
- References:
- Re: seo uk
- From: Stacey
- Re: seo uk
- From: Big Bill
- Re: seo uk
- From: Stacey
- Re: seo uk
- From: Big Bill
- Re: seo uk
- From: Stacey
- Re: seo uk
- From: Big Bill
- Re: seo uk
- From: Stacey
- Re: seo uk
- From: John Bokma
- Re: seo uk
- From: Stacey
- Re: seo uk
- From: John Bokma
- Re: seo uk
- From: Stacey
- Re: seo uk
- Prev by Date: Re: seo uk
- Next by Date: Re: seo uk
- Previous by thread: Re: seo uk
- Next by thread: Re: seo uk
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading