Re: seo uk

"Big Bill" <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ahren1l6hsut8p20je61r2teh2occl536k@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:02:30 +0100, "Stacey"
> <Remove-the-Y-stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>> so I may well have been taken entirely out of contention so that I can
>>> be inspected for good guy status.
>>
>>Never heard of that before. :-)
>
> Speaking loosely, as I sometimes do, they may be suspecting me of foul
> play so I've been pulled in on suspicion. Once they've shone a few
> lights on my face, got the lead pipes out and generally given me the
> third degree, I should be thrown, blinking, back on the sidewalk.
> That's one theory anyway. Poetic, ain't I?


Ok, but why would they do that. I mean if you are totally good why would
they do that without some kind of reason. It doesn't make sense.

>>>> Another little tip did you gain a lot
>>>>of links recently?
>>>
>>> Who can tell? Really? It looks like I have more but Googs might just
>>> be displaying more. Only around 30 more anyway.
>>
>>I am not going by what Google chooses to show. Google still looks at all
>>of
>>them. I would carefully look around at who is linking to you and if they
>>are
>>having problems and you might have acquired a lot of links from them at
>>one
>>time..........to much of a good thing can be a bad thing. This is a hint
>>again.
>
> Lot of hints from you lately..any reason for this? I noticed you got
> on my case well before I did about me going down in the rankings - you
> know something I don't?

Wasn't getting on your case...just trying to let you know so you might
correct it before it was to late. Hints, because from what I see you should
also see. Over 900 links from a one site to fast is not good. Especially if
ya got a link going to that site as well. If that site with the 900 links to
yours is going down in the dumps your site shows relation to so it will go
down into the dumps. And if some sites that you have linked out to are bad
and so on well...it just isn't good.

<snip>

>>
>>Have you checked who all the sites you link to don't link out to crap.
>>This
>>is extremely important. Also, if you link to someone who is being
>>penalized
>>you can also be put in the wash. This is all part of the related search
>>cycle. It is important to watch what the whole group of sites are doing.
>
> I really don't have all day and all night to check every OBL I have. I
> doubt the odd one or two would be important in the context anyway. I
> have a whole load of links to things that I judge to be helpful - ask
> Mogga, her affiliate buddies really loved my links - so if one or two
> of them have gone to the dark side, that's not my fault.

<snip>

If you link out to a site that does bad yes it is your fault to be to that
bad neighborhood. You control your linking standards. You have to make time
to check these things. If you do not have time maybe hire some help. I am
just giving you some friendly advice from what I have found. Plus, if you
don't change some of the linking habits then your site might get totally
washed out. Anyway, I don't have the time to look at all of your site, plus
I am not getting paid for the SEO.:-)

Stacey


.

Quantcast