Re: Further on post deletion
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:23:46 GMT
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:07:42 +0200, Els <els.aNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Big Bill wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:24:23 +0200, Els <els.aNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>John Bokma wrote:
>>>
>>>> Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Given that I've archived the posts, If I reply to them by just tacking
>>>>> a line or two on the end of each, they then become incorporated into
>>>>> my posts so I woud imagine that only I myself could delete them then.
>>>>> Sound reasonable?
>>>>
>>>> If you mean: can I delete my own posts, even if I quote 99% of someone
>>>> else: yes. The original post can only be deleted by the author though :-)
>>>
>>>I think he means it vice versa: if I delete my post, I can only delete
>>>/my/ post. Not the reply to it by someone else who thought it was a
>>>good idea to quote my entire message. Just like x-no-archive:yes
>>>doesn't help much if someone quotes you in full without using that
>>>header.
>>
>> How about if they quote you in full and they do use that header? Which
>> is what I may have done...
>
>Then it'll be deleted after 6 or 7 days though, won't it :-)
>From Google Groups, great archivers of usenet? If that were the case,
why would they be going back and deleting posts anyway?
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Elvis does my SEO
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Further on post deletion
- From: Els
- Re: Further on post deletion
- References:
- Further on post deletion
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Further on post deletion
- From: John Bokma
- Re: Further on post deletion
- From: Els
- Re: Further on post deletion
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Further on post deletion
- From: Els
- Further on post deletion
- Prev by Date: Re: Removing URLs from SE index
- Next by Date: Re: Further on post deletion
- Previous by thread: Re: Further on post deletion
- Next by thread: Re: Further on post deletion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|