Re: How much flash is too much?
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:19:10 GMT
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:11:49 +0100, Davémon <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Flash, in principle, is proprietary. Attempts to hack it and extract some
>> information out of it would be computationally expensive so I imagine that
>> crawlers will not care enough to crawl/descent to it very often.
>
>Sometimes I wonder if you guys ever check anything!
>
>http://www.google.com/search?q=elephant+filetype%3Aswf
>
>that's filetype:swf
>
>Google crawls and registers flash files, and has done for years.
Bits of them. If some content is rendered in such and such a way, bits
of it, undetermined bits of it, may be indexable. We've been
monitoring the situation closer than you, apparently.
>It doesn't do anything with them in terms of normal search results, I'd
>guess because they haven't found an easy, reliable (i.e. hierarchical)
>way of determining its text-contents relevance to a given search (The
>results seem to be heavily influenced by IBLs).
Waste of time for SEO then, isn't it?
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Elvis does my SEO
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How much flash is too much?
- From: catherine yronwode
- Re: How much flash is too much?
- References:
- Re: How much flash is too much?
- From: John Bokma
- Re: How much flash is too much?
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: How much flash is too much?
- From: Big Bill
- Re: Flash for non-content
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: How much flash is too much?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does anyone has experience with the google Serach Appliance
- Next by Date: Re: Flash for non-content
- Previous by thread: Re: Flash for non-content
- Next by thread: Re: How much flash is too much?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading